Features of the information and legal status of officials of anti-corruption bodies

Authors

  • Nataliia Holota Ternopil National Economic University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35774/app2019.02.157

Keywords:

status, corruption, official, rights, obligations, responsibility

Abstract

Legislative consolidation of the basic principles of combating corruption is considered as a guarantee of successful state administration and stable economic development of the state. The presence of a small number of publications and scientific works on the given subject makes it possible to argue that the question of the legal status of anticorruption bodies, in the majority of cases, is approached by the authors through an administrative aspect, focusing on the functions and responsibilities of the anti-corruption bodies.

Determining the peculiarities of the information and legal status of officials of anti-corruption bodies can be based on the provisions of the current legislation, which establish the key functions of officials of anti-corruption bodies, including in particular: prevention of corruption, use of preventive anti-corruption measures; detection, termination, investigation and disclosure of corruption offenses; prevention of corruption (in particular, a special check on persons who are applying for positions related to the functions of the state or local self-government, requirements for transparency of information, etc.); monitoring of the state of prevention and counteraction of corruption in Ukraine; realization of anticorruption policy in the state, as well as other tasks defined by the legislation of Ukraine and others.

Taking into account the scientific approaches to the information-legal statute and specifics of the tasks of officials of state bodies for combating corruption, the following elements should be classified as elements of the information and legal status of officials of anti-corruption bodies:

1) information rights and guarantees of officials of anti-corruption bodies, specially determined by acts in the field of combating corruption, as well as their official instructions, provisions on the answers of the unit;

2) official duties of an informational character, separately established by anticorruption documents, job descriptions, as well as those that arise in the course of the implementation by officials of anti-corruption bodies of their rights;

3) the definition by the current legislation of restrictions on the implementation of information rights, guarantees and obligations by the officials of anti-corruption bodies;

4) the legislation established the responsibility of officials of anti-corruption bodies for improper fulfillment of their information and legal obligations or for the abuse of information rights rights or guarantees.

References

Pavlenko, P.I. (2003). Pravovyy status sluzhbovtsya orhaniv vnutrishnikh sprav: problemy zahalnoyi [Legal status of an official of the internal affairs bodies]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kharkiv [in Ukrainain].

Tkachuk, O.I. (2008). Pravovyy status posadovykh osib mytnoyi sluzhby Ukrayiny [Legal Status of Officials of the Customs Service of Ukraine]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainain].

Yanyuk, N.V. (2003). Administratyvno-pravovyy status posadovoyi osoby [Administrative status of an official]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainain].

Kuznetsova, M.YU. (2018). Informatsiyno-pravovyy status: ponyattya, oznaky, struktura [Information-legal status: concept, signs, structure]. Naukovyy visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriya "Yurydychni nauky". Scientific Bulletin of Kherson State University. Series "Legal Sciences", 2, 165-168 [in Ukrainain].

Kuznetsova, M. YU. (2015). Orhany vykonavchoyi vlady Ukrayiny yak sub'yekt informatsiynykh pravovidnosyn [Bodies of executive power of Ukraine as a subject of information legal relations]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainain].

Rassolov, Y.M., Ahapov, A.B., Protasov, V.N. (2017). [Information legal relations: theoretical aspects]. Moskva Ynformatsyonnye pravootnoshenyya: teoretycheskye aspekty: Prospekt [in Ukrainain].

Pro Antykoruptsiynu stratehiyu na 2018-2020 roky: Proekt Zakonu vid 26.04.2018 №832 [About anticorruption strategy from April 04 2018]. www.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from http://w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/zweb2/webproc 4_1?pf3511=63942 [in Ukrainian].

Metodychni rekomendatsiyi shchodo orhanizatsiyi roboty iz povidomlennyamy pro koruptsiyu: Rishennya Natsionalnoho ahentstva z pytan zapobihannya koruptsiyi vid 06 lypnya 2017. № 286 "Pro zatverdzhennya Metodychnykh rekomendatsiy shchodo orhanizatsiyi roboty iz povidomlennyamy pro koruptsiyu, vnesenymy vykryvachamy" [Methodological recommendations on the organization of work with reports on corruption: Decision of the National Agency for the Prevention of Corruption from July 06, 2017, No. 286 On Approval of Methodological Recommendations on the Organization of Work with Corruption Notices by Contributors]. www.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/v0286884-17 [in Ukrainian].

Kodeks Ukrayiny pro administratyvni pravoporushennya [Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses]. (1984, 07 December). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy – Bulletin of Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Kyiv: Parlam. vyd-vo [in Ukrainian].

Kryminalnyy kodeks Ukrayiny [The Criminal Code of Ukraine]. (2001, 05 April). Ofits. visn. Ukrayiny. – Official bulletin of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].

Published

2019-07-30

Issue

Section

CRIMINAL LAW AND CRIMINOLOGY. THE PENAL LAW. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CRIMINALISTICS. FORENSIC EXAMINATION. OPERATIONAL AC

How to Cite

Holota, Nataliia. “Features of the Information and Legal Status of Officials of Anti-Corruption Bodies”. Actual Problems of Law, vol. 1, no. 2, July 2019, pp. 157-62, https://doi.org/10.35774/app2019.02.157.