Right to respect for family life: problems of the application of the European Court of Human Rights’ practice concerning forced return to Ukraine and banishment from Ukraine

Authors

  • Oksana Yaremko Ternopil National Economic University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35774/app2018.04.094

Keywords:

forced return, banishment, territorial body of migration service, judicial practice, right to respect for family life, principle of proportionality

Abstract

The problem of the non-use by Ukrainian courts of the judicial practice of the European Court of Human Rights concerning the right to respect for family life upon consideration of the cases on the forced return to Ukraine and banishment from Ukraine of the foreigners or stateless persons have been researched in the article. It is pointed out on the insufficiency of consideration upon consideration of the cases on the forced return to Ukraine and banishment from Ukraine of only the fact of violation of legislation on migration by the foreigner or stateless person as well as of the fact of avoiding of exit out of the country at the expiration of the allowed period of residence. It is noticed that such judgements should be entered proportionally in particular with keeping necessary balance between unfavourable consequences for the rights, freedoms and interests of the person and the aims, on achievement of which those decisions are directed

References

Konventsiia pro zakhyst prav liudyny i osnovopolozhnykh svobod Rady Yevropy vid 04 lystopada 1950 r. [The Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of the Council of Europe] (1950, November 04). http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from http: http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/ru/995_004/card2#Card [in Ukrainian].

Kodeks Ukrainy pro administratyvni pravoporushennia vid 07 hrudnia 1984 r. № 8073-X [Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses] (1984, December 07) http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from http: http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/80731-10 [in Ukrainian].

Pro pravovyi status inozemtsiv ta osib bez hromadianstva : Zakon Ukrainy vid 22 veresnia 2011 r. № 3773-VI [On the legal status of foreigners and stateless persons] (2011, September 22). http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from http: http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3773-17 [in Ukrainian].

Pro vykonannia rishen ta zastosuvannia praktyky Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny : Zakon Ukrainy vid 02 hrudnia 2012 r. № 3477-IV [On the implementation of decisions and application of the European Court of Human Rights practice] (2012, December 02). http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from http: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3477-15 [in Ukrainian].

Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny u spravi "Kaplan ta inshi proty Norvehii" № 32504/11 vid 24 lypnia 2014 r. [Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in Kaplan and others v. Norway] (2014, July 24). http://www.migrants.org.ua. Retrieved from http: //www.migrants.org.ua/article/oglyad-praktikiievropeyskogo-sudu-z-prav-lyudini-z-pitan-zahistu-prav-lyudini-v-konteksti [in Ukrainian].

Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny u spravi "Meemi proty Frantsii" № 85/1996/704/896 vid 26 veresnia 1997 r. [Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Meemi v. France] (1997, September 26). http://www1.ombudsman.gov.ua. Retrieved from http: //www1.ombudsman.gov.ua/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=3741%3A2014-05-30-09-44-01&catid=238%3A2014-01-16-12-18-54&Itemid=202# [in Ukrainian].

Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny u spravi "Mustakim proty Belhii" № 12313/86 vid 18 liutoho 1991 r. [Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Mustacem v. Belgium] (1991, February 18). http://unhcr.org.ua. Retrieved from http: //unhcr.org.ua/attachments/article/866/CASE%20OF%20MOUSTAQUIM%20v.%20BELGIUM%20%20Russian%20Translation.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny u spravi "Berrekhab proty Niderlandiv" № 10730/84 vid 21 chervnia 1988 r. [Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Berrehab v. The Netherlands] (1988, June 21). http://unhcr.org.ua. Retrieved from http: //unhcr.org.ua/attachments/article/866/CASE%20OF%20BERREHAB%20v.%20THE%20NETHERLANDS%20%20Russian%20Translation.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Published

2018-12-22

Issue

Section

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND PROCESS. FINANCE LAW. INFORMATION LAW. INTERNATIONAL LAW

How to Cite

Yaremko, Oksana. “Right to Respect for Family Life: Problems of the Application of the European Court of Human Rights’ Practice Concerning Forced Return to Ukraine and Banishment from Ukraine”. Actual Problems of Law, no. 4, Dec. 2018, pp. 94-98, https://doi.org/10.35774/app2018.04.094.