The prosecutor as philosophical and legal subject ininformational law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35774/app2018.04.046Keywords:
public prosecutor, information law, information activities, information legal relations, subject of govern, information interaction, information law principlesAbstract
In the article, the author improved the approach to the essence of the subject of information law as a legal embodiment of a person with information rights, duties and information culture. The author substantiated, that the prosecutor, as a subject of information law, doesn’t exist for working with information, and but information activities, which is implemented by the prosecutor to law-governed state goals achieve the goals and functions of the prosecutor’s office in a law-governed state and society goal. The author used the approach of «subjectivization», which mean, that the application of legal phenomenology methods is based on the departure of the classical sense of concepts, that are associated with its formal interpretation in the normative acts, and, especially, in the internal sense. As sources of the category «prosecutor - the subject of information law», in article is taken into account legal norms-goals and normsprinciples, which are abstracted from a particular type of relationship and make it possible to find out a more general place of the phenomenon in the legal system as a whole.
References
Byelyakov, K.I., (2012). Informatsiyna diyalʹnistʹ: zmist ta pidkhody do klasyfikatsiyi [Information activities: content and approaches to classification]. Informatsiya i pravo, 1(4), 63-69. [in Ukranian].
Vysnovok № 3 (2008). Rolʹprokuratury za mezhamy sfery kryminalʹnoho prava [Conclusion №. 3 (2008). Role of the Public Prosecutor outside the scope of criminal law]. Konsulʹtatyvnoyi rady yevropeysʹkykh prokuroriv, pryynyatyy SSRE na 3-mu plenarnomu zasidanni, Strasburh. https://www.gp.gov.ua. Retrieved from https://www.gp.gov.ua/ua/cmo.html?_m=publications&_t=rec&id=101556 [in Ukranian].
Kovalenko, L. P. (2014). Informatsiyne pravo Ukrayiny: problemy stanovlennya ta rozvytku. [Information Law of Ukraine: Problems of Formation and Development]. Doctor’s thesis. Kharkiv. [in Ukranian].
Konstytutsiya Ukrayiny [Constitution of Ukraine]: Zakon vid 28.06.1996 № 254k/96-VR. Vidomosti Verkhovnoyi Rady Ukrayiny – Bulletin of Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80/page [in Ukranian].
Kormych, B. A. (2011). Informatsiyne pravo. [Information Law.]. Kharkiv: BURUN i K. [in Ukranian].
Nesterenko, I.V. (2015). Prokuror yak subyekt vidnosyn administratyvnoho sudochynstva Ukrayiny. osoblyvist yoho pravovoho statusu u porivnyanni z pravovym statusom inshykh uchasnykiv protsesu [The prosecutor as the subject of administrative judicial proceedings of Ukraine. the peculiarity of his legal status in comparison with the legal status of other participants in the process]. Naukovyy visnyk Uzhhorodsʹkoho natsionalʹnoho universytetu. 35, 158-162, part II. Vol. 2. http://www.visnyk-juris.uzhnu.uz.ua/file/No.35(2)/part_2/42.pdf. Retrieved from http://www.visnyk-juris.uzhnu.uz.ua/file/No.35(2)/part_2/42.pdf [in Ukranian].
Orlyk, D. (2016). Uchast prokurora v dokazuvanni pid chas dosudovoho rozsliduvannya [Participation of the prosecutor in proving during the pre-trial investigation]. Chasopys tsyvilnoho i kryminalʹnoho sudochynstva, 4(19),107-112. http://www.irbis-nbuv.gov.ua. Retrieved from http://www.irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe1&Image_file_name=PDF/Chcks_2014_4_10.pdf [in Ukranian].
Palyukh, A. I. Uchast prokurora v dokazuvanni pid chas dosudovoho rozsliduvannya [Participation of the prosecutor in proving during the pre-trial investigation]. Candidate’s thesis. http://ena.lp.edu.ua. Retrieved from http://ena.lp.edu.ua:8080/bitstream/ntb/34171/1/avt_Paluch.pdf [in Ukranian].
Podolyaka, S. A. (2012). Uchast prokurora u tsyvilʹnykh spravakh [The Public Prosecutor’s Participation in Civil Cases]. Naukovi pratsi MAUP, 4, 142-147 [in Ukranian].
Podolyaka, S. (2016). Metodolohiya doslidzhennya prokuratury yak subʺyekta administratyvnoho protsesu [Methodology of the prosecutor’s office as a subject of the administrative process]. Nashe parvo, 4, 100. http://nashe-pravo.unesco-socio.in.ua. Retrieved from http://nashe-pravo.unesco-socio.in.ua/ [in Ukranian].
Politanskyy, V. S. (2013). Pryntsypy informatsiyno-pravovykh vidnosyn [Principles of information and legal relations]. Chasopys Kyyivskoho universytetu prava, 1, 55-60. [in Ukranian].
Zakon Ukrayiny vid Pro dostup do publichnoyi informatsiyi [Law of Ukraine On access to public information from 13.01.2011 № 2939-VI]. Vidomosti Verkhovnoyi Rady Ukrayiny - Bulletin of Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2939-17 [in Ukranian].
Svitlychnyy, O.P. (2017). Subyekt vladnykh povnovazhen yak uchasnyk informatsiynykh pravovidnosyn [Subject of authority as a participant in information legal relations] Materialy Naukovo-praktychnoyi Internet-konferentsiyi – The materials of scientific practical Internet conference. http://www.legalactivity.com.ua. Retrieved from http://www.legalactivity.com.ua/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1617%3A070917-21&catid=192%3A2-102017&Itemid=238&lang=ru [in Ukranian].
Skakun, O.F. (2001). Teoriya derzhavy i prava [Theory of State and Law]. Kharkiv: Konsum. [in Ukranian].
Stasyuk, O. (2016). Administratyvno-pravovyy status orhaniv prokuratury Ukrayiny [The administrative and legal status of the prosecutor’s office of Ukraine]. Nashe parvo, 1, 66-72. http://nashe-pravo.unesco-socio.in.ua. Retrieved from http://nashe-pravo.unesco-socio.in.ua/ [in Ukranian].
Termin «subyekt prava» [The term «subject of law»]: vidomosti iz elektronnoyi entsyklopediyi "Vikipediya". https://uk.wikipedia.org. Retrieved fromhttps://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D1%83%D0%B1%27%D1%94%D0%BA%D1%82_%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B0 [in Ukranian].
Termin "subʺyekt" [The term "subject of law"]: vidomosti iz akademichnoho tlumachnoho slovnyka ukrayinsʹkoyi movy (1970—1980). – [URL] : http://sum.in.ua/s/sub.jekt [in Ukranian].
Tsymbalyuk, V.S.(2010). Subyekty informatsiynoho prava ta informatsiynoyi diyalnosti [Subjects of information law and information activity]. Pravova informatyka, 3(27), 29-32. http://ippi.org.ua. Retrieved from http://ippi.org.ua/vs-tsimbalyuk-sub%D1%94kti-informatsiinogo-prava-ta-informatsiinoi-diyalnosti [in Ukranian].
Checherskyy, V.I. (2006). Konstytutsiyno-pravovyy status orhaniv prokuratury v Slovachchyni, Polʹshchi, Chekhiyi ta Ukrayini (porivnyalʹno-pravove doslidzhennya). [The constitutional and legal status of the prosecutor’s offices in Slovakia, Poland, the Czech Republic and Ukraine (comparative legal study)]. Doctor’s thesis. Kyiv. [in Ukranian].
Shevchuk, V.I. (2011). Vstup prokurora u tsyvilʹnyy protses, initsiyovanyy inshymy osobamy [The Prosecutor’s Introduction to the Civil Procedure Initiated by Other Persons]. Universytet•sʹki naukovi zapysky,4(40)., 133-140 [in Ukranian].
