Value and features of recognition in criminal processual evidence

Authors

  • Nina Rohatynska Candidate of Law, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Criminal Law and Process
  • Adriana Kuibida Ternopil National Economic University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35774/app2018.03.108

Keywords:

evidence, criminal procedural proof, assessment of evidence, investigator, prosecutor.

Abstract

The research covers the peculiarities of obtaining and admissibility of evidence in criminal proceedings. The scientific approaches were analyzed to define the concept of evidence as the main legal category in criminal proceedings.

References

Kryminalʹno-protsesualʹnyy kodeks Ukrainy [Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine]. (2003). Vidomosti Verkhovnoyi Rady Ukrayiny–Bulletein of Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine.

Honcharenko V. H., Nor V. T,. Shumylj M. YE. (2012). Kryminalʹnyy protsesualʹnyy kodeks Ukrayiny. Naukovo – praktychnyy komentar [Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. Scientific and practical commentary]. Kiev: Justitian [in Ukrainian].

Alenin Yu.P. (Eds). (2009). Kryminalʹno protsesualʹne pravo Ukrainy [Criminal Procedural Law in Ukraine]. Kharkiv: Odissey [in Ukrainian].

Baulin, O. (2017). Ponyattyadokaziv u kryminalʹnomuprotsesi [The notion of evidence in criminal procedure]. Visnyk Natsionalʹnoyi akademiyi prokuraturyUkrayiny - Bulletin of the National Academy of Public Prosecutor of Ukraine, 1, 75-81 [in Ukrainian].

Kotyuk I. I. (2017). Teoretyko-pravovyy analiz suchasnoho rozuminnya ponyattya "dokazuvannya" [Theoretical and legal analysis of modern understanding of notion "proof process"]. Visnyk kryminalʹnoho sudochynstva – Bulletin of criminal proceedings, 1, 50-56 [in Ukrainian].

Lyash A. O.,. Lishchenko V. M. (2012). Ponyattya dokaziv u kryminalʹnomu protsesi [The notion of evidence in criminal procedure]. Chasopys Natsionalʹnoho universytetu "Ostrozʹka akademiya". Seriya "Pravo" – The Journal of the National University of Ostroh Academy. Ser. "Pravo", 2 (6), 180–181. Retrieved from http:// lj.oa.edu.ua/articles/2012/n2/12laoukp.pdf.

Chehrenetsʹ N.V. (2017). Mistse dokaziv ta dokazuvannya v kryminalʹnomu protsesi [Place of evidence and proof process in criminal procedure]. Pravovihoryzonty- Legal horizons, 3, 118-124 [in Ukrainian].

Chemerys I.M. (2017). Problemni pytannya zbyrannya dokaziv u kryminalʹnomu provadzhenni [Problems of collecting evidence in criminal proceedings]. Porivnyalʹno-analitychne pravo - Comparative and analytical right, 5, 341-345 [in Ukrainian].

Shcherbakovsʹkyy M. H. (2017) Vykorystannya dokaziv yak etapdokazuvannya u kryminalʹnomuprovadzhenni [The use of evidence as a proofing stage in criminal proceedings]. Visnyk Kharkivsʹkoho natsionalʹnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav - Bulletin of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, issue 2, 88-95 [in Ukrainian].

Published

2018-09-28

Issue

Section

CRIMINAL LAW AND CRIMINOLOGY. THE PENAL LAW. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CRIMINALISTICS. FORENSIC EXAMINATION. OPERATIONAL AC

How to Cite

Rohatynska, Nina, and Adriana Kuibida. “Value and Features of Recognition in Criminal Processual Evidence”. Actual Problems of Law, no. 3, Sept. 2018, pp. 108-12, https://doi.org/10.35774/app2018.03.108.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

1-10 of 198

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.