Freedom of expression and respect to the judiciary in the context of the practice of the European Court of Human Rights (theoretical generalization of decisions on the cases of «Barfod v. Denmark», «Prager and Oberschlick v. Austria», «De Haes and Gijsels v. Belgium», «Perna v. Italy»)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35774/app2018.02.023Keywords:
freedom of expression, justice, judicial power, respect to the court, courts authority, ECHR practice, legal positions of the ECHRAbstract
The article is devoted to the research of the borders of freedom of speech and freedom of expression in view of the need to preserve authority and respect to the court, because respect to the judiciary ensures the effective justice, guarantees stability, peace and tranquility in the state. In particular, a definition and theoretical generalization of the legal positions of the European Court of Human Rights in the established field was made on the materials of the cases «Barfod v. Denmark», «Prager and Oberschlick v. Austria», «De Haes and Gijsels v. Belgium», «Perna v. Italy»
References
Verba, I.O. (2016) Vidkrytist sudovoi vlady yak harantiia prava na dostup do pravosuddia: teoretyko-pravovi zasady [Openness of the judiciary as a guarantee of the right to access to justice: theoretical and legal basis]. Visnyk Pivdennoho rehionalnoho tsentru Natsionalnoi akademii pravovykh nauk Ukrainy Bulletin of the Southern Regional Center of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 7, 54-61 [in Ukrainian].
Morshchahina, N. (2016) Yak neobgruntovana krytyka vplyvaie na robotu zakonnykiv [As unsubstantiated criticism affect the performance of the lawyers] – Retrieved from http://zib.com.ua/ua/126032-znecinena_ femida_yak_neobgruntovana_kritika_vplivae_na_robot.html [in Ukrainian].
Povaha do suddiv tse kultura, yaka formuietsia rokamy, Hanna Yudkivska [Respect for judges is a culture that is formed over the years, Anna Yudkivska] – Retrieved from http://zib.com.ua/ua/103556-povaga_do_ suddiv_-_ce_kultutra_yaka_formuetsya_rokami-_ganna.html [in Ukrainian].
Chymnyi, R. Pidtrymannia avtorytetu Femidy dlia Yevropy vazhlyvishe za svobodu vyrazhennia pohliadiv [The maintenance of the authority of Themis for Europe is more important than freedom of expression] – Retrieved from http://zib.com.ua/ua/14963-pidtrimannya_avtoritetu_sudu_dlya_evropi_vazhlivishe_za_svob. html [in Ukrainian].
Sprava "Barfod proty Danii" [Case of Barfod v. Denmark] – Retrieved from http://cedem.org.ua/library/ sprava-barfod-proty-daniyi-2/ [in Ukrainian].
Sprava "Praher i Obershlik proty Avstrii" [Case of Prager and Oberschlick v. Austria] – Retrieved from http://cedem.org.ua/library/sprava-prager-i-obershlik-proty-avstriyi/ [in Ukrainian].
Sprava "De Khaes i Hiisels proty Belhii" [Case of De Haes and Gijsels v. Belgium] – Retrieved from http:// europeancourt.ru/resheniya-evropejskogo-suda/de-xaes-i-gijsels-protiv-belgii-postanovlenie-evropejskogosuda/ [in Russian].
Sprava "Perna proty Italii" [Case of Perna v. Italy] Retrieved from http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/980_051 [in Ukrainian].
