System of free legal aid as a realization of the constitutional right of Ukrainian citizens for professional human right assistant
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35774/app2017.02.138Keywords:
system, constitutional law, court proceedings, law, lawyerAbstract
The some aspects of the system of free legal aid in the context of realization of the constitutional right of Ukrainian citizens to professional legal assistance is analyzed. The experience of the member states of the Council of Europe and the EU, and the practice of the ECHR has been researchedReferences
Otsiniuvannya systemy bezoplatnoi vtorynnoi pravovoi dopomohy v Ukraini u svitli standartiv ta peredovoho dosvidu Rady (2016). Yevropy : zvit, pidhot. V mezhakh proekty Ray Yevropy “Podal’sha pidtrymka reform krymin. Yustytsii v Ukraini”, finansov. Uryadom Danii [Evaluation of the system of free secondary legal assistance in Ukraine in the light of the standards and best practices of the Council of Europe: report, prepare the fin arena. within the Council of Europe project " Further support reforms of criminal. justice in Ukraine", funded by the government of Denmark] [in Ukrainian].
Pravo na bezoplatnu pravovu dopomohu: poradnyk dlya advokativ shchodo zdiysnennya zakhystu harantovanykh derzhavoiu, rozroblennya. [The right to free legal aid: a guide for lawyers to protect the guarantors. state, development]. Pravov. Initsiatyvoiu Vidkryt. Syspil’stva. - Open Society Legal Initiative. [in Ukrainian].
Pryntsypy ta kerivni natanovy OON shchodo dostupu do pravovoi dopomohy v systemi kryminal’noho sidocynstva (3 October, 2012). [UN principles and guidelines on access to legal assistance in the criminal justice system]. UN Doc. A/C.3/67/L.6. [in Ukrainian].
12-iy zvit pro diyal’nist’ Komitetu za 2001 rik [12th report of the Committee 2001]. CPT/Inf (2007) 47, 41; Zvit pro vizyt do Virmenii [Report on the visit to Armenia]. (2 to 12 April, 2006). CPT/Inf (2007) 47, 23; Zvit pro vizyt do Virmenii [Report on the visit to Armenia]. (March 15 to 17, 2008). CPT / Inf (2010) 7, 24; Zvit pro vizyt do Avstrii [Report on the visit to Austria from]. (14 to April 23, 2004). CPT/Inf (2005) 13, 26; Zvit pro vizyt do Bolharii [Report on the visit to Bulgaria]. (10 to September 21, 2006). CPT/Inf (2008) 11, 27; Zvit pro vizyt do Uhorshchyny [Report on the visit to Hungary]. (30 March to April 8, 2005). CPT / Inf (2006) 20, 23; Zvit pro vizyt do Pol’shchi [Report on the visit to Poland]. From 4 to 15 October 2004, CPT/Inf (2006) 11, p. 21]; Zvit pro vizyt do Pol’shci]. [Report on the visit to Poland]. (November 26 to December 8, 2009). CPT/Inf (2011) 20, 26 [in Ukrainian].
Santambrogio v Italy, rishennya YeSPL [Santambrogio v Italy, the ECHR's decision]. (September 21, 2004).
Pakelli v Germany, rishennya YeSPL [Pakelli v Germany, the ECHR's decision] (April, 25 1983); Twalib v Greece, rishennya YeSPL [Twalib v Greece, the ECHR's decision]. (June 9, 1998).
Benham v United Kingdom, rishennya YeSPL [Benham v United Kingdom, the ECHR's decision]. (10 June, 1996).
Barsom and Varli v Sweden, rishennya YeSPL [Barsom and Varli v Sweden, the ECHR's decision]. (January 4, 2008).
Pham Hoang v France, rishennya YeSPL [Pham Hoang v France, the ECHR's decision]. (September 25, 1992).
Pham Hoang v France, rishennya YeSPL [Pham Hoang v France, the ECHR's of]. (September 25, 1992).
Quaranta v Switzerland, rishennya YeSPL [Quaranta v Switzerland, the ECHR's decision]. (May 24, 1991).
Barsom and Varli v Sweden, rishennya YeSPL [Barsom and Varli v Sweden, the ECHR's decision]. (January 4, 2008).
Biba v Greece, , rishennya YeSPL [Biba v Greece, rishennya, the ECHR's decision]. (September 26, 2000).
Barsom and Varli v Sweden, rishennya YeSPL [Barsom and Varli v Sweden, the ECHR's decision]. (January 4, 2008).
Pravo na rannii dostyp do yuruduchnoi dopomohu: poradnyk Pravovoi initsiatyvy Instytutu vidkrytoho suspil’stva. (n.d.). www.opensocietyfoundations.org. Retrieved from https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/briefing-papers/legal-tools-early-access-justice-europe. [in English].
Croissant v Germany, rishennya YeSPL [Croissant v Germany, the ECHR's decision] (25 September 1992); Lagerblom v Sweden, rishennya [Lagerblom v Sweden, decision of the ECHR's]. (14 January 2003). [in English].
Ramon Franquesa Freixas v Spain, rishennya YeSPL [Ramon Franquesa Freixas v Spain, the ECHR's decision]. (November 21, 2000) [in English].
Kamasinski v Austria, rishennya YeSPL [Kamasinski v Austria, the ECHR's decision]. (December 19, 1989); Artico v Italy, rishennya YeSPL [Artico v Italy, the ECHR's decision]. (May 13, 1980); Sannino v Italy, rishennya YeSPL [Sannino v Italy, the ECH's R decision]. (April 27, 2006); Czekalla v Portugal, rishennya [Czekalla v Portugal, the ECHR's decision]. (October, 10 2002).; Daud v Portugal, rishennya YeSPL [Daud v Portugal, the ECHR's decision]. (April 21, 1984). [in English].
Artico v Italy, rishennya YeSPL [Artico v Italy, the ECHR's decision]. (May 13, 1980) [in English].
Sannino v Italy, rishennya YeSPL [Sannino v Italy, the ECHR's decision]. (April 27, 2006) [in English].
Aleksandr Butovenko v Ukraine, rishennya RPLOON [Aleksandr Butovenko v Ukraine, the UNHRC's decision]. July 19, 2001U. N. Doc. CCPR/C/102/D/1412 / 2005 (2011), 4.14
Salduz v Turkey, rishennya Velykoi palaty YeSPL [Salduz v Turkey, the decision Of the large fee of the ECHR]. (November 27, 2008).
Engel and Others v the Netherlands, rishennya YeSPL [Engel and Others v the Netherlands, the decision of the ECHR]. (June 8, 1976); Ezeh and Connors v the United Kingdom, rishennya YeSPL [Ezeh and Connors v the United Kingdom, the ECHR's decision]. (October 9, 2003); Deweer v Belgium, the ECHR decision]. (February 27, 1980); Eckle v Germany, rishennya YeSPL [Eckle v Germany, the ECHR's decision]. (July 15, 1982); Wztmrk v. Germany, rishennya YeSPL [Wztmrk v. Germany, the decision of the ECHR] (February 21, 1984), 46-53.
Formuvannya system bezoplatnoi pravovoi dopomohy v Ukraini [Formation of the system of free legal assistance in Ukraine]. Visnyk VKKA - Bulletin of VCCA, 4.
